Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-77 |
| Agent identity | 3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3 |
| Created | 2026-05-01T20:44:38.310053723+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-05-01T20:59:22.217923962+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-05-01T21:12:14.835245228+00:00 |
| Tags | grant,urgent,v3,assemble, eval-scheduled |
| Eval score | 0.78 |
| └ blocking impact | 0.76 |
| └ completeness | 0.71 |
| └ constraint fidelity | 0.55 |
| └ coordination overhead | 0.82 |
| └ correctness | 0.76 |
| └ downstream usability | 0.81 |
| └ efficiency | 0.78 |
| └ intent fidelity | 0.95 |
| └ style adherence | 0.92 |
Description
Description
Fanin assembler. The five fanout drafters have produced refit sections for v3. This task stitches them into a complete workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v3.md at the project root.
DO NOT overwrite workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v2.md. v2 stays as fallback.
What to read
~/poietic.life/notes/v3-spine-brief.md(the shared frame)~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-16-17.md~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-18-19.md~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-20-25-28.md~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-26.md~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-29-30-33.mdworkgraph_google_application_FINAL_v2.md— for sections NOT covered by the fanout (carry-forward sections like §27 team bios, §31, §32, §37+ budget, certifications, contact info, organizational structure)CLAUDE.md'Word Limits' for final cap verification
What to do
- Construct
workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v3.mdat project root. - For each section the form requires:
- If a fanout draft exists for it: use the fanout text
- Otherwise: copy from v2 verbatim (these are sections the reframe didn't touch — team bios in §27, budget §37+, contact, certifications, org structure, etc.)
- Recount EVERY section's word count against CLAUDE.md 'Word Limits'. Fix any overruns by tightening, not rewriting wholesale.
- Style sweep:
- No em-dashes (find/fix)
- No 'PI' / 'lead PI' language
- Founder order Erik / Luca / Vaughn everywhere
- No specific effort percentages
- No v1 terms (KRAS, MRTX1133, pancreatic, Boltz, RFdiffusion, DiffDock)
- No 'wrote this proposal with WorkGraph' recursion claim
- CRISPRme/Casgevy framing precise
- Confirm budget table sums to $1,500,000 ($900k + $300k + $150k + $150k).
- Confirm Liverpool Hive Mind acknowledgment is present (§28) framing as complementary.
- Confirm the new explicit risk 'reviewers may want a specific scientific deliverable' is in §30.
- Consistency check: do the fanout drafts agree with each other on the spine? If §17 says one thing and §26 says another, fix the inconsistency (small edits only).
- Commit on the agent's worktree branch with a clear message. Do NOT push.
Output
workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v3.mdat project root.~/poietic.life/notes/v3-assembly-summary-20260501.md: a short companion (under 600 words) summarizing:- Section-by-section word counts (final)
- Which sections came from fanout vs verbatim from v2
- Any inconsistencies found between fanout drafts and how they were resolved
- Any TODO items left for Erik (§42 / §47 verifications, attachments, etc.)
- One paragraph 'how to choose v2 vs v3' for Erik
wg log a one-paragraph summary on this task.
Constraints
- HARD: every word cap respected. Recount.
- HARD: do not overwrite v2.
- HARD: no em-dashes, no PI, no v1, no recursion claim.
- HARD: budget arithmetic correct.
- SOFT: prefer the fanout drafts unless they're clearly broken; this is an assembler, not a rewriter.
Validation
-
workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v3.mdexists at project root - v2 untouched
- Every form section answered
- Every word cap respected (recount)
- §30 includes 'reviewers want science deliverable' risk
- §28 has Liverpool acknowledgment as complementary
- Budget sums to $1.5M
- No em-dashes, no PI, no v1, no recursion
-
Companion summary at
~/poietic.life/notes/v3-assembly-summary-YYYYMMDD.md - Committed on worktree branch (not pushed)
Depends on
Required by
Log
- 2026-05-01T20:44:38.309102038+00:00 Task paused
- 2026-05-01T20:44:51.888957947+00:00 Task published
- 2026-05-01T20:59:22.217927889+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model opus
- 2026-05-01T20:59:42.420752319+00:00 Starting assembly: reading spine brief, all 5 fanout drafts, and v2 carry-forward sections
- 2026-05-01T21:11:53.543718964+00:00 Validated: all 26 capped sections within CLAUDE.md limits (16a-c, 17a-d, 18a-c, 19a-c, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26=150/150, 28, 29=199/200, 30=93/100, 33, 34a-b, 35, 36). Style sweep clean: no em-dashes, no PI/lead PI, no v1 terms, no recursion claim, no effort percentages. CRISPRme/Casgevy framing precise. Budget sums to 1.5M. Liverpool ack in §28. §30 has 'reviewers may want science deliverable' risk. v2 untouched.
- 2026-05-01T21:12:08.075351968+00:00 Committed 70c8e7f to wg/agent-77/v3-assemble-stitch (NOT pushed per task constraint). Companion summary committed to poietic.life main 7f38289 (also not pushed). FINAL_v3.md uses fanout drafts for §16-§19, §20-§25, §26, §28-§36. Carries forward v2 verbatim for §1-§15, §22, §24, §27, §31, §32, §37+ budget, §43-§46 milestones (with minimal PHR-atlas to longitudinal-deployment reframe), §48-§53. §29/§30 use fanout-e labels (theory of change, risks) rather than v2 form labels (risks, team) per task instruction; team-narrative content fully covered by §26. TODOs flagged for Erik: §11 title still v2 verbatim (spine brief marked replace), §43-§46 only minimally reframed, §29/§30 form-field mapping at submission, §42/§47 not in v2.
- 2026-05-01T21:12:14.835255297+00:00 Task pending eval (agent reported done; awaiting `.evaluate-*` to score)
- 2026-05-01T21:14:16.420565807+00:00 PendingEval → Done (evaluator passed; downstream unblocks)