v3-fanout-b-18 — Workgraph

Metadata

Status	done
Assigned	`agent-64`
Agent identity	`3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3`
Created	2026-05-01T20:43:27.266894795+00:00
Started	2026-05-01T20:52:20.608197655+00:00
Completed	2026-05-01T20:55:23.556340160+00:00
Tags	`grant,urgent,v3,fanout`, `eval-scheduled`
Eval score	0.95
└ blocking impact	1.00
└ completeness	1.00
└ coordination overhead	1.00
└ correctness	1.00
└ downstream usability	1.00
└ efficiency	0.95
└ intent fidelity	0.86
└ style adherence	1.00

Description

Fanout drafter B. Refits deliverables (§18) and impact (§19) to the v3 spine. Reads spine brief, reads v2's existing §18/§19, writes new versions.

Spine reminder: Poietic PBC = open-source infrastructure for reliable hybrid human-AI work in genomics. Reference-resources (vg, PGGB, HPRC) are the demonstration anchor. Demonstration = longitudinal deployment in founders' active research, NOT a constructed PHR-rare-disease arc.

What to read

~/poietic.life/notes/v3-spine-brief.md
workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v2.md — current §18 and §19
CLAUDE.md 'Word Limits'

What to write

Output: ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-18-19.md

Every subsection (§18a, §18b, §18c, §19a, §19b, §19c) has a 75-word cap. Recount.

§18 — Deliverables (concrete artifacts)

Mature WorkGraph (multi-user, integrations with Gemini / AlphaGenome via Chorus / Claude / open-weight, hardening)
Public corpus of auditable computation graphs from real genomics workflows (Erik's pangenome construction, Luca's clinical CRISPR analysis)
BioBench: open benchmark for agentic biology (Luca leading, drawing on community network)
Vaughn's ethnographic case studies of hybrid coordination, published organizational design framework targeting ASQ or Research Policy
Adoption metric: independent labs using WorkGraph for their own work

§19 — Impact

Frame: when reference resources, clinical genomics analyses, and comparative genomics work are conducted with auditable hybrid coordination, the entire downstream research community benefits. Errors and biases get caught earlier; provenance is traceable; replication is feasible. Honest about being upstream of clinical use. Public-good framing fits PBC mission. Adoption is the falsifiable external claim.

Constraints

Each subsection ≤75 words. Recount.
No em-dashes. No PI. Founder order Erik / Luca / Vaughn.
No specific clinical results promised. No PHR-rare-disease arc.
No DNA-Diffusion as funded scope (Luca COI).
Output as markdown: ### §18a\n[text]\n### §18b\n[text]\n...

Validation

All six subsections drafted
Every subsection ≤75 words
Spine brief read first
Reference-resource anchor present in deliverables
Output at ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-18-19.md

## Description

Fanout drafter B. Refits deliverables (§18) and impact (§19) to the v3 spine. Reads spine brief, reads v2's existing §18/§19, writes new versions.

Spine reminder: Poietic PBC = open-source infrastructure for reliable hybrid human-AI work in genomics. Reference-resources (vg, PGGB, HPRC) are the demonstration anchor. Demonstration = longitudinal deployment in founders' active research, NOT a constructed PHR-rare-disease arc.

## What to read
1. `~/poietic.life/notes/v3-spine-brief.md`
2. `workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v2.md` — current §18 and §19
3. `CLAUDE.md` 'Word Limits'

## What to write

Output: `~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-18-19.md`

Every subsection (§18a, §18b, §18c, §19a, §19b, §19c) has a 75-word cap. Recount.

### §18 — Deliverables (concrete artifacts)
- Mature WorkGraph (multi-user, integrations with Gemini / AlphaGenome via Chorus / Claude / open-weight, hardening)
- Public corpus of auditable computation graphs from real genomics workflows (Erik's pangenome construction, Luca's clinical CRISPR analysis)
- BioBench: open benchmark for agentic biology (Luca leading, drawing on community network)
- Vaughn's ethnographic case studies of hybrid coordination, published organizational design framework targeting ASQ or Research Policy
- Adoption metric: independent labs using WorkGraph for their own work

### §19 — Impact
Frame: when reference resources, clinical genomics analyses, and comparative genomics work are conducted with auditable hybrid coordination, the entire downstream research community benefits. Errors and biases get caught earlier; provenance is traceable; replication is feasible. Honest about being upstream of clinical use. Public-good framing fits PBC mission. Adoption is the falsifiable external claim.

## Constraints
- Each subsection ≤75 words. Recount.
- No em-dashes. No PI. Founder order Erik / Luca / Vaughn.
- No specific clinical results promised. No PHR-rare-disease arc.
- No DNA-Diffusion as funded scope (Luca COI).
- Output as markdown: `### §18a\n[text]\n### §18b\n[text]\n...`

## Validation
- [ ] All six subsections drafted
- [ ] Every subsection ≤75 words
- [ ] Spine brief read first
- [ ] Reference-resource anchor present in deliverables
- [ ] Output at `~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-18-19.md`

Depends on

Required by

Log

2026-05-01T20:43:27.264384608+00:00 Task paused
2026-05-01T20:44:51.888974328+00:00 Task published
2026-05-01T20:52:20.608202414+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model opus
2026-05-01T20:52:30.055259651+00:00 Starting: reading spine brief and v2 §18/§19 sections
2026-05-01T20:53:48.818521181+00:00 Read spine brief and v2 §18/§19; drafting v3 versions
2026-05-01T20:55:20.158933665+00:00 Committed 679e812 to poietic.life main, pushed to remote
2026-05-01T20:55:20.169343424+00:00 Validated: all 6 subsections present (§18a 66, §18b 64, §18c 68, §19a 64, §19b 68, §19c 69 words), all ≤75; no em-dashes, no PHR/rare-disease arc, no DNA-Diffusion, no PI language, founder order Erik/Luca/Vaughn; reference-resource anchor (vg, PGGB, HPRC, CRISPResso, CRISPRme) present in §18a and §18b
2026-05-01T20:55:23.556352314+00:00 Task pending eval (agent reported done; awaiting `.evaluate-*` to score)
2026-05-01T20:57:51.828593260+00:00 PendingEval → Done (evaluator passed; downstream unblocks)