← graph

v3-fanout-a-16

v3 fanout A: §16 problem + §17 approach

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-66
Agent identity3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3
Created2026-05-01T20:43:15.495996132+00:00
Started2026-05-01T20:52:21.194844041+00:00
Completed2026-05-01T20:55:23.197677615+00:00
Tagsgrant,urgent,v3,fanout, eval-scheduled
Eval score0.92
└ blocking impact0.95
└ completeness0.95
└ coordination overhead0.95
└ correctness0.95
└ downstream usability0.90
└ efficiency0.90
└ intent fidelity0.51
└ style adherence0.95

Description

Description

Fanout drafter A. Refits problem statement (§16) and approach (§17) to the v3 spine. Reads the spine brief, reads v2's existing §16 and §17, writes new versions that align with the new frame.

Spine reminder: Poietic PBC = open-source infrastructure for reliable, careful, auditable hybrid human-AI work in computational and clinical genomics. Reference-resource construction (vg, PGGB, HPRC) is the concrete demonstration anchor.

What to read

  1. ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-spine-brief.md (produced by v3-spine-brief task)
  2. workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v2.md — current §16 and §17 specifically
  3. CLAUDE.md 'Word Limits' for the exact caps

What to write

Output: ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-16-17.md

For EVERY subsection (§16a, §16b, §16c, §17a, §17b, §17c, §17d), write the new text. Each subsection has a hard 75-word cap. Recount after writing. If over, cut.

§16 — Problem

Frame the problem as: scientific work in genomics is high-stakes, error-sensitive, and increasingly hybrid (human + AI agents + algorithmic pipelines). Current tools either treat AI as ephemeral assistant (Claude Code, Codex, Deep Research — session-scoped) or treat science workflows as data pipelines (Galaxy/Nextflow/Snakemake — no agentic actors). Neither preserves auditable hybrid coordination. Reference-resource construction is one canonical example of where this fails: the work is collaborative, multi-actor, error-sensitive, and demands traceable decision-making, but no infrastructure makes that legible.

§17 — Approach

Frame as: Poietic PBC builds WorkGraph (open-source MIT, Rust, in production today). Persistent task graph where humans and AI agents are peers. Auditable across sessions, operators, machines. Agent-agnostic (Claude, Gemini, AlphaGenome via Chorus, GPT, open-weight). The grant matures the infrastructure (multi-user, integrations, hardening) and demonstrates it longitudinally on the founders' active genomics work, including reference-construction workflows where reliability is operationally critical.

Constraints

  • Each subsection within its 75-word cap. Recount.
  • No em-dashes. No PI language. Founder order Erik / Luca / Vaughn.
  • No v1/KRAS terms. No PHR-rare-disease bridge.
  • Reference-resource anchor present in the approach (not necessarily problem).
  • Output is markdown, structured as: ### §16a\n[text]\n### §16b\n[text]\n... etc.

Validation

  • All seven subsections drafted
  • Every subsection ≤75 words (recount)
  • Spine brief read first
  • No em-dashes, no PI language, no v1 terms
  • Output at ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-sections/v3-section-16-17.md

Depends on

Required by

Log