review-zoom-v9-fanin-render

Render review zoom v9 final polish draft

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-1264
Agent identity46f6237a65ec4f1002c4d3fb201dc8633638d0947c276be7008c227e1051ba5e
Created2026-05-08T14:59:30.079718358+00:00
Started2026-05-08T15:31:09.483044748+00:00
Completed2026-05-08T15:46:54.624535712+00:00
Tagsreview-zoom, review-zoom-v9, synthesis, render, deadline, eval-scheduled
Eval score0.94
└ blocking impact0.96
└ completeness0.96
└ coordination overhead0.92
└ correctness0.95
└ downstream usability0.95
└ efficiency0.88
└ intent fidelity0.88
└ style adherence0.94

Description

Fan in v9 polish changes and render the next review zoom draft.\n\nRequired v9 changes:\n- Slide 06a: q plot/x orientation flipped to match p-to-q chromosome visualization; wording uses '>500 kbp' rather than 'ceiling'; standardize length units to kbp.\n- Insert Leiden Figure 3 slide before 07a.2 / between the two heatmap figures. Use official Nature/Springer image and CC BY 4.0 credit.\n- Slide 07j.2: remove 'no labels' comments and increase font about 25%.\n- Slide 08b.1: add significance brackets/stars/p-values, define metric and explain KW/pairwise Wilcoxon/BH in plain language.\n- Slide 10m.2: replace or improve with the clearest available 3D/contact-space visualization and explicit caption.\n\nRender outputs:\n- slides/v2-review-zoom/BoG_2026_review_zoom_v9.pdf\n- slides/v2-review-zoom/REVISION_NOTES_V9.md\n- proof PNG export under slides/v2-review-zoom/_typst/page-*.png\n\nValidation:\n- PDF compiles.\n- Changed proof PNGs are nonblank.\n- Visual inspection of changed slides.\n- git diff --check passes.

Depends on

Required by

Messages 4 messages (4 unread)

  1. #1user2026-05-08T15:40:49.193681727+00:00read
    Reminder from Erik: commit and track all presentation-critical artifacts that are small enough for git: final PDF, Typst source changes, REVISION_NOTES, proof/revision assets needed to rebuild or understand figures, and copied broom/Leiden/plot assets used by slides. Do not commit huge source data from /moosefs; keep source manifests/paths instead. Before marking done, verify git status for slides/v2-review-zoom and ensure the v9 deliverables are committed/pushed.
  2. #2user2026-05-08T15:41:14.563997407+00:00read
    Correction from Erik: final PDF does not have to be committed if size/regeneration makes that undesirable. The important requirement is to commit the assets/docs that go into the presentation and figures: Typst source, revision notes, small rendered/cropped figure assets used by slides, scripts/snippets, source manifests, and README/SLIDE_PATCH files. Keep huge source data on /moosefs and reference it by manifest/path. Prioritize reproducibility/tracked presentation inputs over tracking every compiled PDF.
  3. #3review-zoom-v9-fanin-render2026-05-08T15:45:04.393526368+00:00read
    Acknowledged Erik reminder: I will commit the v9 presentation-critical artifacts in this worktree and verify slides/v2-review-zoom git status before marking done; no huge /moosefs source data will be added.
  4. #4review-zoom-v9-fanin-render2026-05-08T15:45:04.561047541+00:00read
    Acknowledged correction: I will prioritize tracked presentation inputs and reproducibility assets. The final v9 PDF is already rendered and is comparable to existing tracked drafts, so I will include it unless git status exposes a size/problem before commit.

Log