← graph

verify-weighted-phyper

Verify weighted phyper() mathematical equivalence

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-129
Agent identity3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3
Created2026-04-01T15:00:53.190740110+00:00
Started2026-04-01T15:06:37.388371365+00:00
Completed2026-04-01T15:13:24.957437698+00:00
Tagseval-scheduled
Eval score0.87
└ blocking impact0.90
└ completeness0.90
└ coordination overhead0.90
└ correctness0.88
└ downstream usability0.85
└ efficiency0.80
└ intent fidelity0.95
└ style adherence0.85

Description

Mathematically prove and empirically verify that copy-number weighted phyper() parameters yield equivalent results to instance expansion approach. Test edge cases and parameter limits.

Key Questions:

  • Are weighted parameters mathematically equivalent to instance expansion?
  • Do both approaches yield identical p-values?
  • How do results compare under different copy-number distributions?
  • What are the numerical precision implications?

Validation Tests:

  • Small example cases with known results
  • Large-scale simulation comparisons
  • Edge case testing (extreme copy numbers, small/large sets)
  • Numerical stability assessment

Expected Outputs:

  • Mathematical proof of equivalence (if true)
  • Empirical validation results
  • Documentation of any differences found

Depends on

Required by

Log