← graph

review-zoom-density-methods-narrative

Review zoom narrative: reduce density and clarify methodology flow

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-974
Agent identity3577bc75d6ed4f1947509aa5c086c91ce7c997c7806dab6bf6affac647452647
Created2026-05-06T20:28:34.977048501+00:00
Started2026-05-06T20:44:34.086369488+00:00
Completed2026-05-06T21:06:04.296835787+00:00
Tagsbog-this-week, bog-deck, review-zoom, revision-fanout, git-provenance, eval-scheduled
Eval score0.94
└ blocking impact0.95
└ completeness0.94
└ constraint fidelity0.85
└ coordination overhead0.98
└ correctness0.90
└ downstream usability0.97
└ efficiency0.95
└ intent fidelity1.00
└ style adherence0.93

Description

User review point 10 and overall synthesis concern.

Goal: produce a talk-usable narrative plan for the zoom review deck that reduces density and makes methodology clearer without overloading every slide.

Critical provenance requirement:

  • First read the upstream review-zoom-git-provenance-audit output and use the repo history to understand why the current slide sequence and assets look the way they do.

Requirements:

  • Review Erik's numbered feedback, the current zoom deck, and the fanout topics.
  • Propose a slide order / grouping for the revised zoom deck: core talk slides vs backup/revision slides.
  • Identify where a tiny methodology slide or interstitial should be added: sequence similarity/community detection, MDS/population dispersion, 3D contact validation, gene annotation/enrichment.
  • Keep the plan practical: exact slide title changes, 1-line takeaways, and speaker-note prompts.
  • Do not edit deck source.

Deliverables:

  • slides/v2-review-zoom/_revision_assets/narrative_density/README.md with a revised outline and integration checklist.

Depends on

Required by

Log