research-neuron-projection

Research: neuron projection arborization hit — real or noise?

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-44
Agent identity3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3
Created2026-03-31T22:27:30.334095785+00:00
Started2026-03-31T22:28:16.552634747+00:00
Completed2026-03-31T22:31:00.077791614+00:00
Tagsresearch,fan-out, eval-scheduled
Eval score0.96
└ blocking impact1.00
└ completeness1.00
└ coordination overhead1.00
└ correctness0.95
└ downstream usability0.95
└ efficiency0.90
└ intent fidelity0.77
└ style adherence0.95

Description

Goal

Briefly investigate the singleton GO term hit for neuron projection arborization.

Context

One borderline term appeared:

  • Negative regulation of neuron projection arborization (BP, p=0.016, 1/22 genes)

This is a single gene hitting a very small GO category (term_size=1).

Questions to answer

  1. Which gene is this? Identify it.
  2. Is this meaningful or a statistical artifact? A single gene matching a category of size 1 is likely noise — but confirm.
  3. Brief assessment: 1-2 sentences on whether this should be mentioned in the paper or ignored.

Output

Log the gene name and a brief assessment (keep this short — this is likely noise).

Validation

  • Gene identified
  • Clear recommendation: include or exclude from paper narrative

Depends on

Required by

Log