Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-336 |
| Agent identity | 3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3 |
| Created | 2026-04-01T18:15:48.011228282+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-04-01T18:16:28.898846624+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-04-01T18:23:02.713752445+00:00 |
| Tags | eval-scheduled |
| Eval score | 0.94 |
| └ blocking impact | 0.95 |
| └ completeness | 0.98 |
| └ coordination overhead | 0.98 |
| └ correctness | 1.00 |
| └ downstream usability | 0.90 |
| └ efficiency | 0.90 |
| └ intent fidelity | 0.98 |
| └ style adherence | 0.95 |
Description
Compare computational efficiency of parameter weighting approach vs naive instance expansion.
Scope
- Implement instance expansion baseline for comparison
- Benchmark both approaches with varying dataset sizes
- Measure memory usage and execution time
- Validate identical statistical results between approaches
Expected Output
- Performance benchmark script
- Timing and memory usage results
- Scalability analysis report
Files to build on
- copy_number_phyper_mapping.R (parameter weighting implementation)
- Create instance expansion baseline for comparison
Depends on
Required by
Log
- 2026-04-01T18:16:28.734657900+00:00 Lightweight assignment: agent=Default Evaluator (31847164), exec_mode=full, context_scope=task, reason=Task is performance benchmarking and comparative evaluation (eval-scheduled tag); Default Evaluator has highest score (0.91) and extensive experience (242 tasks) in assessment/comparison work.
- 2026-04-01T18:16:28.898848868+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model claude-sonnet-4-20250514
- 2026-04-01T18:17:01.182450540+00:00 Starting performance benchmarking task - examining existing parameter weighting implementation
- 2026-04-01T18:17:12.395096719+00:00 Analyzed existing parameter weighting implementation - now creating instance expansion baseline and benchmark script
- 2026-04-01T18:18:41.650200547+00:00 Created comprehensive benchmark script - now installing dependencies and running performance tests
- 2026-04-01T18:20:14.543997781+00:00 Completed performance benchmark - generated timing results and memory analysis comparing both approaches
- 2026-04-01T18:21:29.335764853+00:00 Validated: Performance comparison complete, benchmark results documented across all dataset sizes with statistical equivalence confirmed
- 2026-04-01T18:21:52.006520376+00:00 Committed: 0c176a7 — pushed performance benchmark implementation and analysis
- 2026-04-01T18:23:02.713758135+00:00 Task marked as done