Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-6 |
| Agent identity | 878cbf9599cf182ab787a9ecc3aa961cd075035434149b8628772e56c6a1cff9 |
| Model | claude:sonnet |
| Created | 2026-04-28T01:46:48.044663513+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-04-28T01:55:32.650391675+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-04-28T02:02:42.782088187+00:00 |
| Tags | eval-scheduled |
| Eval score | 0.87 |
| └ blocking impact | 0.88 |
| └ completeness | 0.85 |
| └ constraint fidelity | 0.85 |
| └ coordination overhead | 0.89 |
| └ correctness | 0.90 |
| └ downstream usability | 0.84 |
| └ efficiency | 0.82 |
| └ intent fidelity | 0.88 |
| └ style adherence | 0.88 |
Description
Description
Identify literal visual elements of WorkGraph (TUI views, graph rendering, terminal output, graphwork.github.io aesthetics) that could be embedded as live or semi-live elements on poietic.life. The user wants the page to BE a piece of WorkGraph, not describe one.
Scope
- Run and observe:
wg --help,wg viz,wg list,wg status,wg watch,wg show <task>. Note what each produces visually. - Read the workgraph repo source for TUI rendering code, Mermaid/Graphviz output, ASCII graph rendering, JSONL audit format.
- Read graphwork.github.io and inspect its visual style.
- Note motifs: task DAG view, terminal aesthetic, JSONL audit trail, agent state view, chat/message threading, evolver visualization.
Output
VISUAL_LANGUAGE.md at repo root with:
- Catalog of WorkGraph visual elements: name, what it shows, code/source reference, ASCII sample or screenshot reference
- For each: embedding strategy on poietic.life (live, snapshot, animated SVG, recorded asciicast, embedded mermaid, etc.)
- Wireframe sketch (ASCII or markdown) of a redesigned poietic.life using 3-5 of these elements as the actual content (not decoration)
- Honest call: feasibility inside a single static HTML file vs requiring build step or live API
Constraints
- Research and sketch, not implementation. Do not modify index.html or the public landing page repo.
- No em dashes.
Validation
- VISUAL_LANGUAGE.md exists
- At least 5 distinct WorkGraph visual elements catalogued
- Each has an embedding strategy
- Wireframe sketch shows where each element lives
- Static-HTML vs build-step vs live-API feasibility called out
Depends on
Required by
Log
- 2026-04-28T01:46:48.044457490+00:00 Task paused
- 2026-04-28T01:51:05.195399544+00:00 Task published
- 2026-04-28T01:51:28.572882742+00:00 Lightweight assignment: agent=Default Documenter (8da3b6fc), exec_mode=light, context_scope=task, reason=Documenter excels at research synthesis and producing structured documentation; this task is cataloging visual elements and writing VISUAL_LANGUAGE.md with analysis, not implementation.
- 2026-04-28T01:55:32.650393309+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model sonnet
- 2026-04-28T01:55:40.282354256+00:00 Starting visual language study: running WorkGraph commands and reading source code
- 2026-04-28T01:59:59.407681830+00:00 Catalogued visual elements from source code and live output. Writing VISUAL_LANGUAGE.md
- 2026-04-28T02:02:35.558053030+00:00 Committed 9d52f4a — VISUAL_LANGUAGE.md, 531 lines, 8 elements, wireframe, feasibility matrix
- 2026-04-28T02:02:42.729324152+00:00 Validated: all 5 criteria met -- VISUAL_LANGUAGE.md exists, 8 elements catalogued, 8 embedding strategies, wireframe present, static/build/live feasibility matrix
- 2026-04-28T02:02:42.782092255+00:00 Task pending eval (agent reported done; awaiting `.evaluate-*` to score)
- 2026-04-28T02:04:50.132805878+00:00 PendingEval → Done (evaluator passed; downstream unblocks)