Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-180 |
| Agent identity | 3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3 |
| Created | 2026-05-01T23:25:56.049290448+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-05-01T23:37:33.728119534+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-05-01T23:42:37.983515328+00:00 |
| Tags | grant,urgent,v3,fix,high-value, eval-scheduled |
| Eval score | 0.87 |
| └ blocking impact | 0.90 |
| └ completeness | 0.90 |
| └ constraint fidelity | 0.85 |
| └ coordination overhead | 0.90 |
| └ correctness | 0.88 |
| └ downstream usability | 0.85 |
| └ efficiency | 0.85 |
| └ intent fidelity | 0.81 |
| └ style adherence | 0.95 |
Description
Description
This is a TARGETED fix task: address ONE specific panel criticism by producing a structured fix spec. The assembler will apply all specs deterministically to v3 → v3.1.
Read criticism source: ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-review-synthesis-20260501.md
Read current v3: git show 70c8e7f:workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v3.md (worktree branch wg/agent-77/v3-assemble-stitch)
Read CLAUDE.md word limits.
Output
~/poietic.life/notes/v3-fixes/fix-XXX.md with sections:
- Criticism (verbatim from synthesis)
- Target section + word cap
- Current text (verbatim from v3)
- Proposed text (your fix)
- Word count check (before / after / cap)
- Rationale (one paragraph: why this fix lands the criticism)
Constraints
- Word cap respected (recount).
- No em-dashes, no PI language, no v1 terms, no recursion claim.
- CRISPRme/Casgevy framing precise. DNA-Diffusion not in funded scope.
- Founder order Erik / Luca / Vaughn.
- Do NOT edit v3 directly. Only produce the spec.
This fix
Criticism (H7): github.com/poietic-pbc/phr-methodology-comparison has 1 commit, region not selected as of submission day. v3 implies 'demonstration in motion' which the public repo contradicts.
Target: Either edit §28 to drop the demonstration-in-motion implication OR flag for Erik to push a commit naming the region/species set.
Action: Identify exact phrases in v3 that imply demonstration in motion, propose softer alternatives (e.g., 'methodology-comparison repository scaffolded' instead of 'demonstration in motion'). This is a content-only spec; if the only honest fix is Erik pushing a commit, flag that as Erik-only and propose the section text that works regardless.
Output: ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-fixes/fix-h7.md
Depends on
Required by
Log
- 2026-05-01T23:25:56.045234932+00:00 Task paused
- 2026-05-01T23:30:57.882213077+00:00 Task published
- 2026-05-01T23:37:33.728122319+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model opus
- 2026-05-01T23:39:48.372191482+00:00 Read v3 §28, §17a, §17c, §29, §31. Read fix-h2 (§17a) and fix-h3 (§28→99/100). v3 already dropped v2 'demonstration in motion' set piece. Closest residual is §28 'in daily use across founder labs' — endorsed by H2, no honest reduction available. §28 capacity exhausted by H3. Spec will be Erik-only repo action with no v3 text change.
- 2026-05-01T23:42:33.137224408+00:00 Committed: 342469f, pushed to poietic.life main. Validation: spec contains all required sections (criticism / target+cap / current / proposed / wordcount / rationale); 0 em-dashes; constraint pass for v1 terms, recursion claim, founder order; CRISPRme/Casgevy and DNA-Diffusion not invoked. §28 word count after H3+H7 = 99/100.
- 2026-05-01T23:42:37.983523363+00:00 Task pending eval (agent reported done; awaiting `.evaluate-*` to score)
- 2026-05-01T23:44:24.071051772+00:00 PendingEval → Done (evaluator passed; downstream unblocks)