Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-168 |
| Agent identity | 8da3b6fc81685ca44a4e15eb35307ab90ce3f0500e9c08b8b0caae848f7d4ce9 |
| Created | 2026-05-01T23:26:16.872046200+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-05-01T23:34:44.896023428+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-05-01T23:39:52.281260991+00:00 |
| Tags | grant,urgent,v3,fix,divergent, eval-scheduled |
| Tokens | 1001080 in / 19332 out |
| Eval score | 0.78 |
| └ blocking impact | 0.90 |
| └ completeness | 1.00 |
| └ constraint fidelity | 0.70 |
| └ coordination overhead | 0.95 |
| └ correctness | 0.95 |
| └ downstream usability | 0.95 |
| └ efficiency | 0.90 |
| └ intent fidelity | 0.65 |
| └ style adherence | 1.00 |
Description
Description
This is a TARGETED fix task: address ONE specific panel criticism by producing a structured fix spec. The assembler will apply all specs deterministically to v3 → v3.1.
Read criticism source: ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-review-synthesis-20260501.md
Read current v3: git show 70c8e7f:workgraph_google_application_FINAL_v3.md (worktree branch wg/agent-77/v3-assemble-stitch)
Read CLAUDE.md word limits.
Output
~/poietic.life/notes/v3-fixes/fix-XXX.md with sections:
- Criticism (verbatim from synthesis)
- Target section + word cap
- Current text (verbatim from v3)
- Proposed text (your fix)
- Word count check (before / after / cap)
- Rationale (one paragraph: why this fix lands the criticism)
Constraints
- Word cap respected (recount).
- No em-dashes, no PI language, no v1 terms, no recursion claim.
- CRISPRme/Casgevy framing precise. DNA-Diffusion not in funded scope.
- Founder order Erik / Luca / Vaughn.
- Do NOT edit v3 directly. Only produce the spec.
This fix (DIVERGENT FINDING — Erik decides)
Criticism: Sympathetic reviewer praised §29 as 'unusually honest.' Skeptical reviewer attacked it as 'three paragraphs of hedge, reads as expecting to underdeliver.' Same words, opposite read.
Target: §29 (200w cap)
Action: Produce TWO versions in the spec:
- Keep-honest version (current §29 trimmed/sharpened to maximize the 'unusually honest' read while removing any phrases that read as hedging).
- Trim-confidence version (§29 reworded with same content but more confident voice — fewer hedges, more declarative).
Both must respect 200w cap. Both must NOT recreate v2's clinical-results overclaim. Spec recommends one but produces both for Erik to choose.
Output: ~/poietic.life/notes/v3-fixes/fix-divergent-29.md
Depends on
Required by
Log
- 2026-05-01T23:26:16.869068915+00:00 Task paused
- 2026-05-01T23:30:58.253273458+00:00 Task published
- 2026-05-01T23:34:02.399237547+00:00 Lightweight assignment: agent=Default Documenter (8da3b6fc), exec_mode=full, context_scope=clean, reason=Documenter role is designed for structured document writing; this task requires producing two constrained textual variants of §29 with precise output format, perfectly aligned with documenter capabilities.
- 2026-05-01T23:34:44.896028498+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model opus
- 2026-05-01T23:39:52.281272503+00:00 Task pending eval (agent reported done; awaiting `.evaluate-*` to score)
- 2026-05-01T23:42:53.543682439+00:00 PendingEval → Done (evaluator passed; downstream unblocks)