review-all-impls

Peer review (claude:opus): cross-model review of all four impls + integration

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-1862
Agent identity3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3
Modelclaude:opus
Created2026-05-02T23:58:21.241540768+00:00
Started2026-05-03T04:44:29.270321699+00:00
Completed2026-05-03T04:55:24.357640270+00:00
Tagsreview,peer-review,nex,chat,quality, eval-scheduled
Eval score0.89
└ blocking impact0.89
└ completeness0.93
└ coordination overhead0.93
└ correctness0.87
└ downstream usability0.90
└ efficiency0.85
└ intent fidelity0.67
└ style adherence0.96

Description

Description

Cross-model peer review of all five impl tasks (I1-I4 + INT). Each impl ran on codex:gpt-5.5; this review runs on claude:opus per the user's modulation 2026-05-02 (pattern C: opus reviews codex's work, including the eval verdict, and emits a calibrated cross-model verdict).

Originally planned as one review per impl, consolidated into a single combined review because the 10-task subtask cap on the design agent ran out. The consolidation is acceptable because the reviewer sees the full delta as one coherent change before issuing a verdict.

What to read

For each of fix-nex-cursor-corruption, fix-supervisor-restart-backoff, fix-tui-supervisor-coexistence, fix-chat-dir-race, integrate-nex-chat-end-to-end:

  • git log --oneline main..<impl-branch> — commits on the impl agent's worktree branch
  • git diff main..<impl-branch> — full diff
  • wg show <task-id> — Validation checklist + log entries + Evaluations section (LLM eval + FLIP scores)

Then look at the SYSTEM-LEVEL signal:

  • wg show smoke-tui-nex-end-to-end once that's run (the simulated-human end-to-end is the ultimate truth)

What to produce (via wg log on review-all-impls)

For EACH of the five tasks:

Form A — concur

TASK <id>: VERDICT concur
Rationale: <2-4 sentences on diff + tests + scores>

Form B — concerns

TASK <id>: VERDICT concerns
Items:
  - <file:line> — <specific issue>
  - <file:line> — <specific issue>
Rationale: <why these matter; whether they block integration or are follow-ups>

Then a final OVERALL:

OVERALL: <ship | iterate | escalate>
- ship: every task concur, integration smoke passes
- iterate: ≥1 task has concerns that should be addressed before SYN smoke runs
- escalate: cross-impl pattern (e.g. all four impls misuse the same primitive) needs human attention

Operating constraints

  • READ ONLY — no source mods.
  • Independence — form your verdict from the diff + tests + scores, not from the impl agent's self-assessment.
  • Calibrated — disagree with the eval verdict if warranted (flag as a separate concern).
  • Specific — every concerns item cites file:line.

Validation

  • All five tasks reviewed (one verdict each)
  • OVERALL summary produced
  • At least 2 file:line citations per non-concur task
  • No source modifications

Depends on

Required by

Log