Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-931 |
| Agent identity | 327a66f93b1aa1e2d1dc008e138f3bdf4fbb906dd8edbf815d490d0351817b61 |
| Model | claude:opus |
| Created | 2026-05-06T13:52:39.856825958+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-05-06T13:54:31.318962914+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-05-06T14:02:31.781096031+00:00 |
| Tags | lit-review, eval-scheduled |
| Eval score | 0.86 |
| └ blocking impact | 0.90 |
| └ completeness | 0.90 |
| └ constraint fidelity | 0.70 |
| └ coordination overhead | 0.90 |
| └ correctness | 0.85 |
| └ downstream usability | 0.80 |
| └ efficiency | 0.85 |
| └ intent fidelity | 0.80 |
| └ style adherence | 0.95 |
Description
##############################################################################
LIT-REVIEW TOPIC TASK — claude:opus REDISPATCH AFTER REPEATED BAIL
##############################################################################
REPEATED FAILURE WARNING.
This task has bailed twice now: once on codex:gpt-5.5 (first round, 30-60s
bail without writing files), once on claude:sonnet (second round, also
bailed silently while 12/14 sister topics succeeded). You are claude:opus
on the third try. Do the work properly.
WHAT YOU MUST PRODUCE.
Two committed files:
paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_.md (>= 1500 words, structured)
paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_.bib (>= 10 BibTeX entries)
REQUIRED STEP ORDER. Do these in sequence:
STEP 1 — orient (~3 min):
Read paper_prep/synthesis/ABSTRACT_nature.md (or ABSTRACT_BoG.md fallback).
Read paper_prep/synthesis/CROSSWALK.md sections 1-3.
Read end-to-end-report/report/12_literature.md.
Read existing benchmark files: paper_prep/lit_review/topic_03_*.md and
topic_06_.md (or any other topic_NN_.md visible) — these are quality
templates. Match or exceed their depth and structure.
Run wg log <task-id> "Step 1 done — substrate read".
STEP 2 — search (~10 min):
Use WebSearch to find 10-30 papers in scope. Capture citation-quality
metadata for each. Run wg log <task-id> "Step 2 done — found N papers".
STEP 3 — write the .md (~20 min):
File: paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_.md
Required structure (5 sections, ~300 words each, ~1500 floor):
## Era overview
## Key papers in chronological order
## Findings most relevant to claim Cn of the abstract
## How this topic intersects adjacent topics
## Open questions and recent developments
Cite inline using \cite{key} or [Author Year]. Run `wg log
"Step 3 done — wrote N words"`.
STEP 4 — write the .bib (~5 min):
File: paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_.bib
Min 10 BibTeX entries. Required fields: author, title, year, journal/
booktitle, doi or url. Use slug as key prefix. Do NOT duplicate entries
already in paper_prep/synthesis/REFERENCES.bib (check first via
grep -E "^@" paper_prep/synthesis/REFERENCES.bib). Run `wg log
"Step 4 done — wrote N entries"`.
STEP 5 — verify on disk:
ls -la paper_prep/lit_review/topic_*.md # your file exists
ls -la paper_prep/lit_review/topic_*.bib # your file exists
wc -w paper_prep/lit_review/topic_*.md # >= 1500
grep -c "^@" paper_prep/lit_review/topic_*.bib # >= 10
If any check fails, return to step 3 or 4.
STEP 6 — commit:
git add paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_.md paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_.bib
git commit -m "docs: lit review topic NN — "
Run wg log <task-id> "Step 6 done — committed <hash>".
STEP 7 — record + done:
wg artifact paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_*.md
wg artifact paper_prep/lit_review/topic_NN_*.bib
wg done
DO NOT call wg done before Step 6 has committed both files. The prior two
rounds had agents calling done in 30-60s without writing anything. Be the
agent that actually produces the files.
##############################################################################
THIS TOPIC (05 — slug: acrocentric_rdna_robertsonian): Acrocentric short arms (chr13/14/15/21/22 p-arms). They share rDNA arrays + satellite repeats; they undergo Robertsonian translocation (~1/1000 newborns). Floutsakou et al. on rDNA-distal duplicons; Henderson 1972 NORs; Robertson 1916. Guarracino 2023 acrocentric pseudohomology paper (the predecessor in the same arc as this manuscript) and de Lima/Guarracino 2025 Robertsonian. Why acrocentrics are the canonical pseudohomology system. TIME RANGE: 1916-present. SEED REFERENCES: Guarracino 2023 acrocentric; de Lima/Guarracino 2025 Robertsonian; Floutsakou 2013; Henderson 1972 NORs; Robertson 1916. Find ~15-25 more covering rDNA evolution, NOR sharing, satellite analysis, Robertsonian breakpoints. Anchor claim(s) per CROSSWALK: C5 (acrocentric clade), C8 (concerted evolution at rDNA).
Depends on
Required by
Log
- 2026-05-06T13:52:39.836197897+00:00 Task paused
- 2026-05-06T13:52:42.472087101+00:00 Task published
- 2026-05-06T13:54:31.318966531+00:00 Spawned by coordinator --executor claude --model opus
- 2026-05-06T13:54:55.706499663+00:00 Starting task — orienting via substrate read
- 2026-05-06T13:55:49.934771001+00:00 Step 1 done — substrate read (ABSTRACT_nature, CROSSWALK §1-3, 12_literature, topic_03 + topic_06 benchmarks, REFERENCES.bib keys)
- 2026-05-06T13:58:44.719841452+00:00 Step 2 done — found ~22 papers covering 1916-2026; spans Robertson, Henderson, Schmickel, Krystal, Worton, Therman, Page, Bandyopadhyay×2, Stults, Floutsakou, Stimpson, Jarmuz-Szymczak, McStay 2016, van Sluis 2019, T2T/HPRC era, Guarracino 2023, de Lima 2025, Cechova-Hartley 2025 great apes, Hartley 2026 biobank
- 2026-05-06T14:00:45.070685344+00:00 Step 3 done — wrote 1892 words across 5 sections in topic_05_acrocentric_rdna_robertsonian.md
- 2026-05-06T14:02:10.855032350+00:00 Step 4 done — wrote 22 bib entries (slug-prefixed; no duplicates with REFERENCES.bib)
- 2026-05-06T14:02:20.703106074+00:00 Step 6 done — committed 8da64a0
- 2026-05-06T14:02:31.781103235+00:00 Task pending eval (agent reported done; awaiting `.evaluate-*` to score)
- 2026-05-06T14:04:18.422165264+00:00 PendingEval → Done (evaluator passed; downstream unblocks)