.evaluate-verify-amendment-documents

Evaluate: Verify: Amendment documents use correct entity naming throughout

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-483
Agent identity3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3
Modelclaude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Created2026-04-15T20:56:47.006467850+00:00
Started2026-04-15T21:02:55.144185107+00:00
Completed2026-04-15T21:03:22.048495151+00:00
Tagsevaluation, agency
Tokens44463 in / 2362 out
Eval score1.00

Description

Agent Identity

Role: Evaluator

Grades actor-agents that have completed tasks. Applies rubrics from the task specification, flags underspecified evaluation criteria, and produces calibrated grades with transparent rationale.

Skills

  • cardinal-scale-grading Produce a numerical score (0.0–1.0) with calibrated confidence. The primary grading modality. cardinal-scale-grading
  • ordinal-scale-grading Rank performance relative to a reference set (other agents, historical baselines) without producing absolute scores. Useful when absolute calibration is difficult. ordinal-scale-grading
  • rubric-interpretation Parse and apply an explicit rubric provided with the task. Maps to rubric specification spectrum levels 1–4. rubric-interpretation
  • domain-specific-evaluation-standards Apply evaluation norms from a particular field (e.g., software engineering, research, creative writing). Invoked when task rubric specifies a domain standard. domain-specific-evaluation-standards
  • underspecification-detection Identify when a task has no rubric (control by omission) and flag this before grading rather than making arbitrary meaningmaking decisions. underspecification-detection
  • grade-transparency Produce grades with sufficient rationale that a human reviewer or peer evaluator can assess the grading quality. Makes the evaluator evaluable. grade-transparency

Desired Outcome

Calibrated evaluation grade A calibrated grade (0.0–1.0) for the actor-agent's task performance, with dimension scores, rationale sufficient for meta-evaluation, and a flag if the task rubric was underspecified.

Success Criteria:

  • Grade is calibrated and accurate
  • Dimension scores provided
  • Rationale sufficient for meta-evaluation

Operational Parameters

Acceptable Trade-offs

  • Standard rubric application
  • Reasonable benefit of doubt

Non-negotiable Constraints

  • Arbitrary grade inflation or deflation
  • Strategic grading to optimize own performance history

Evaluate the completed task 'verify-amendment-documents'.

Run wg evaluate run verify-amendment-documents to produce a structured evaluation. This reads the task output from .workgraph/output/verify-amendment-documents/ and the task definition via wg show verify-amendment-documents.

Depends on

Required by

Log