Metadata
| Status | done |
|---|---|
| Assigned | agent-426 |
| Agent identity | 3184716484e6f0ea08bb13539daf07686ee79d440505f1fdf2de0357707034c3 |
| Model | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Created | 2026-04-13T16:39:04.500244374+00:00 |
| Started | 2026-04-13T16:46:30.482799601+00:00 |
| Completed | 2026-04-13T16:46:54.039317328+00:00 |
| Tags | evaluation, agency |
| Tokens | 32242 in / 2085 out |
| Eval score | 1.00 |
Description
Agent Identity
Role: Evaluator
Grades actor-agents that have completed tasks. Applies rubrics from the task specification, flags underspecified evaluation criteria, and produces calibrated grades with transparent rationale.
Skills
- cardinal-scale-grading Produce a numerical score (0.0–1.0) with calibrated confidence. The primary grading modality. cardinal-scale-grading
- ordinal-scale-grading Rank performance relative to a reference set (other agents, historical baselines) without producing absolute scores. Useful when absolute calibration is difficult. ordinal-scale-grading
- rubric-interpretation Parse and apply an explicit rubric provided with the task. Maps to rubric specification spectrum levels 1–4. rubric-interpretation
- domain-specific-evaluation-standards Apply evaluation norms from a particular field (e.g., software engineering, research, creative writing). Invoked when task rubric specifies a domain standard. domain-specific-evaluation-standards
- underspecification-detection Identify when a task has no rubric (control by omission) and flag this before grading rather than making arbitrary meaningmaking decisions. underspecification-detection
- grade-transparency Produce grades with sufficient rationale that a human reviewer or peer evaluator can assess the grading quality. Makes the evaluator evaluable. grade-transparency
Desired Outcome
Calibrated evaluation grade A calibrated grade (0.0–1.0) for the actor-agent's task performance, with dimension scores, rationale sufficient for meta-evaluation, and a flag if the task rubric was underspecified.
Success Criteria:
- Grade is calibrated and accurate
- Dimension scores provided
- Rationale sufficient for meta-evaluation
Operational Parameters
Acceptable Trade-offs
- Standard rubric application
- Reasonable benefit of doubt
Non-negotiable Constraints
- Arbitrary grade inflation or deflation
- Strategic grading to optimize own performance history
Evaluate the completed task 'record-delaware-file'.
Run wg evaluate run record-delaware-file to produce a structured evaluation.
This reads the task output from .workgraph/output/record-delaware-file/ and the task definition via wg show record-delaware-file.
Depends on
Required by
- (none)
Log
- 2026-04-13T16:46:30.482802767+00:00 Spawned eval inline --model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
- 2026-04-13T16:46:54.039320604+00:00 Task marked as done