audit-board-resolution

Audit: Board Resolution naming — verify if 'Poietic PBC' is used prematurely

Metadata

Statusdone
Assignedagent-460
Agent identityf51439356729d112a6c404803d88015d5b44832c6c584c62b96732b63c2b0c7e
Modelclaude:opus
Created2026-04-13T20:56:32.987471899+00:00
Started2026-04-13T21:01:44.364849189+00:00
Completed2026-04-13T21:03:43.271174928+00:00
Tagseval-scheduled
Eval score0.92
└ blocking impact0.88
└ completeness0.94
└ coordination overhead0.90
└ correctness0.93
└ downstream usability0.92
└ efficiency0.90
└ intent fidelity0.97
└ style adherence0.90

Description

Description

An independent review flagged that the Board Resolution (02_Board_Resolution_Amendment.typ) may use 'Poietic PBC' as the entity name in the header/preamble before the amendment is effective. The Stockholder Consent correctly uses 'Poietic, Inc.' (the current legal name) and references the name change prospectively.

Check:

  1. Read corporate/02_Board_Resolution_Amendment.typ
  2. Identify every occurrence of 'Poietic PBC' vs 'Poietic, Inc.'
  3. Determine if 'Poietic PBC' appears as the current entity name (bug) vs. prospective reference to the post-amendment name (correct)
  4. Board resolutions commonly say things like 'RESOLVED, that the name shall be changed to Poietic PBC' — that's fine. But if the document header says 'Board Resolution of Poietic PBC' that's wrong because the legal name at time of signing is still 'Poietic, Inc.'

If the naming is premature, fix it:

  • Header/preamble should use 'Poietic, Inc.'
  • Prospective references to the new name are fine
  • Match the pattern used in 03_Stockholder_Consent.typ

After any changes, run make all from the corporate/ directory to rebuild PDFs.

Validation

  • The entity is referred to as 'Poietic, Inc.' in all places where the current legal name is used
  • Prospective references to 'Poietic PBC' are clearly framed as future/post-amendment
  • PDFs compile without errors

Depends on

Required by

Log